Friday, January 31, 2014

Literature Summary: “The Subjection of Women.”

John Stuart Mill
(1806 – 1873)


Who Is He?
            
John Stuart Mill was best known for his radical philosophy on the rights of the individual, work on the tyranny of the majority, and women’s rights.  He was also known for his thoughts on political economy and his social activism. 

Important Works
The following list is in no way complete.  Mill was constantly writing, these works are some of his most major projects and accomplishments.

“Tyranny of the Majority”
“Social Liberty”
“The Negro Question” – An argument with Thomas Carlyle on the question of slavery
“Utilitarianism”
“On Liberty”
“The Subjection of Women”

“The Subjection of Women.”
(1869)
Chapter 1

“Men do not want solely the obedience of women, they want their sentiments. All men, except the most brutish, desire to have, in the woman most nearly connected with them, not a forced slave but a willing one, not a slave merely, but a favourite. They have therefore put everything in practice to enslave their minds. The masters of all other slaves rely, for maintaining obedience, on fear; either fear of themselves, or religious fears.”
           
           Mill begins his argument by stating one of the major hindrances to human development and progress is the subordination of one person to another.  In order to overcome this dilemma is of course the opposite of subordination, and that is equality.  In the first few pages of chapter one, Mill points out three factors in the hindrance that he spoke on previously that of power, religion, and government.  Granted, power is abused in many forms other than just religion and government, but in the case of women, husband’s abuse so called power as well. 
            In the case of religion, religion has been oppressing women and suppressing their rights for quite some time now.  Mill reminds us that religion exercises the power to send thousands to their deaths in wars and through sacrificing, it takes away from people at the prime of their lives and forces them to live in poverty, fasting, and prayer shut up in convents.  Religion has the power to force husbands to give up their wives.  Mill defines religion as an instrument of conflict and it has little power to stop wars and prevent others from being cruel to one another, especially in this case against women.  Mill does not forget to include governments in this case either.  He defines government, in particular in this case kings, as an instrument that is supposed to stop the conflict that religion is unable to stop itself, but says that kings are unable to do this either.  Kings are unable to put a stop to conflict because of greed and the thirst for more power and control as in the case of religion and its inability.  Mill hypothesizes that in order to put an end to the chaotic tug of war of power is to establish complete equality; equality in power, rights, and free national institutions. 
            Mill attacks those that believe in the power of force and superiority.  Speaking on the case of women, Mill ties slavery of the southern United States into the argument.  Slave owners in the United States believed that the African slave was given to them by heaven and earth.  Slave owners argued that slaves were incapable of freedom and should not get it.  At the same time Mill argues that this same belief by slave owners also is applied to the brave and strong when they think it is their station in life to have power, authority, and master status over the weak of the species.  As a result of these tied in subjects Mill states this is the reason to women being subjected by men.  Men believe that women should not have their freedom because they do not need it; men adopt a “master” status when it comes to women.
            Women have had a consistent method to fight against their oppression and that is through writing.  Their works have culminated in them fighting for suffrage through petitioning parliament.  Mill explains that freedom is often not obtained all at once, but through time.  Initial complaints are seldom about power itself, but rather about oppression in general. 
            Mill disagrees with the opposite way in which children are raised.  Females are raised to think they must do everything in opposite to their male counterparts; largely they are taught how to submit to the authority and superiority of males.  Depending on how women present their level of submission increases their sexual appeal to men. Women, Mill theorizes, increase in sexual attraction when they are meek, submissive, and give up their freedom to men. 
            With the amount of power men have over women; women’s rights and safety decline.  As a result of this power, governments make laws defining this power and enforce these laws over women so they dare not challenge the power of their male masters and overseers.  Even in the case of extreme mistreatment and abuse, women will seldom dare to escape the clutches of their male master.  Government laws over women are established so as to dissuade any idea of collective rebellion. 
            Mill warns the progressing society of complacency, though women are gaining equality, this does not mean that women have achieved complete equality.  Equality should be a constant endeavor and objective by those that seek its establishment in society.  He further warns men of their ignorance of history and error in thought when they claim they know the thoughts of women simply because of amatory relations.  Because men have a sexual encounter with a woman therefore they must know exactly how women think, Mill rejects this thinking error.  This is the case because subordination and affection will not allow for perfect understanding of women for men.  If men want to understand women better than they do then they must improve the treatment of women with total equality; oppression and subordination must be cast out. 
            Men are disgusted with women and their increasing literary skills because their only vocation should be that of wife and mother.  If women refuse to get married than it is necessary to compel them to with laws and force.  Laws and force come from men, government, and religion.  In the case of religion and government, they are both ran by men, essentially men use those two institutions to further their own interests and make up rules, commandments, and laws to force women into marital servitude. 


Chapter 2      

“Absolute fiends are as rare as angels, perhaps rarer: ferocious savages, with occasional touches of humanity, are however very frequent.”               
            
             Mill continues in chapter 2 his discussion on marriage by talking about men and religion being a compelling factor for women in the marriage relationship.  For more desirable women, men and religion will compel her into marriage with the only escape being life in a convent.  The church does little to nothing to curb forced marriages.  They do ask for a direct yes from the bride, but the bride is forced to be there nonetheless. 
            After the bride enters marriage she is expected to be entirely obedient to her husband without question.  Mill argues this arrangement is worse than the relationship a slave has with their master.  The slave his often not attached to the master all day, the slave often is able to live a short life other than to purely be a slave to a master.  He is able to come home and have a family on his own.  A woman on the other hand is forced to be at her husband’s side at all times.  She becomes his entertainment.  Her treatment is poor by her husband master.  He is able to do all manner of vile things to her through force.  At times, if he so chooses, she is raped by him and treated no better than an animal.  She is not allowed to have property.  All of her possessions at the time of marriage are forcefully surrendered to him, after marriage she will no longer have possessions of her own, all things will belong to her husband.
            In relation to children that the husband and wife had together, they do not belong to her only to him.  He alone has the power of life and death over his children, his final word over them is law, and she has no control over them.  If she chooses to leave her husband master she will lose her children for good and will not be allowed to see them.  Often the husband has the power to compel her to return, in particular through force.  A man is protected by law to essentially do whatever he wants to and with his wife excepting murder, though there have been many cases where the husband is not found out or convicted. 
            The place for women is in the home and as a result society will not tolerate a woman who over steps her bounds in this respect.  Accordingly, she is taught from a very impressionable and young age that her only business is to helping her husband further title, helping her son gain societal advantage and prominence, and she will be charged with raising her daughters to think as she thinks, that she is answerable to men.  As a result of the husband to wife relationship, Mill asks the question, if there is a disagreement between the two whose decision is the outcome?  Of course Mill argues that the man’s decision and position in the argument prevails. 
            In his conclusion of chapter 2 which is largely dedicated to the institution of marriage, Mill urges those who engage in marriage to let it be a marriage of equality rather than of obedience.  It is justifiable to state that Mill’s vision of marriage is a social construct based on love, equality, on respect and all sincerity.    


Chapter 3   
   
            “Even if every woman were a wife, and if every wife ought to be a slave, all the more would these slaves stand in need of legal protection: and we know what legal protection the slaves have, where the laws are made by their masters.”

            Mill begins by stating a generality that men cannot tolerate the idea of living with an equal.  Mill combats this idea by drawing in many historical examples where women were successful in male dominated spheres in particular in ruling. 


Deborah: 

She became famous for her peoples belief in her prophetic skills.  She is the only female judge mentioned in the Bible for her talents at military command.  The Jewish Virtual Library argues that Deborah is perhaps the Bible’s greatest female example. 


In roughly 600 years later we still remember her name.  Her name was immortalized by her actions and through literally the tens of thousands written on just her by many authors, especially by the more famous of authors like Shakespeare, Twain, and Voltaire just to name a few.  At just 16 years of age, Joan of Arc claims to have been called by God to deliver France from her enemy, England.  Her actions, bravery, and defiance to rigid gender norms literally changed the course to the 100 Years War with England.  She was eventually was captured and sold to the English where she was put in prison and tortured.  As a result of her not denouncing communication with God and heaven, she was burned at the stake.  She was canonized in 1920 by the Catholic Church.  Her inspiration is far reaching even into the current time.


Queen Elizabeth was known as the Virgin Queen for her refusal to marry and allow a man to control her possessions, life, and her country.  She was an independent and strong woman.  She was highly intelligent, she was fluent in 6 languages and she had a sharp political mind, something she no doubt gained for herself and inherited from her father King Henry VIII and mother Queen Anne Boleyn.  Her long and enduring reign is considered one of the greatest in England’s history.  Her reign was one fraught with uncertainties and her throne was always under threat by internal and external enemies; enemies that she crushed with political strategy, military might, and loyal aids.  Arts in England also flourished; she personally attended the first ever showing of Shakespeare’s “A Midsummer Night’s Dream.”  Her reign lasted for 45 years.        


Young Victoria was crowned the Queen of England at the age of 18.  Queen Victoria ruled England at the height of empire.  At her death it was said the sun never set on the English empire.  She ruled a vast empire that progressed industrially and economically.  Unfortunately, much like Deborah, Joan of Arc, and Queen Elizabeth I, Queen Victoria’s life was also fraught with dangers as she endured at least 7 attempts on her life.  Through hard work, and enduring the death of her close husband, she showed the country that she was up to the challenge of exerting influence throughout the realm.  With the rise of Constitutional Monarchy she still worked hard to let the voice of the monarch be heard.  She was the first English monarch to travel by train.  Her reign of 64 years was the longest in Britain’s history. 


            Granted he just slightly touched on them more information was added for each great woman in history individually to give more justice to their accomplishments and to their names.  The women above are just some women that Mill briefs touches on in this great work. 
            Mill uses these examples to prove women are just as capable as men in succeeding in political life, which disproves the myth that women are no capable of ruling or being involved in politics.  He explains women are self-educated and learn independently as they are often forced to do as a result of discrimination in education. 
            Mill also addresses the pitiful myth that men are more intelligent than women because of their smaller brain.  Mill states this belief is often credited to women being physically smaller; as a result women must be less intelligent than men, for men are larger.  Mill draws larger men into the argument and states because these men are larger than they must be more intelligent than all other men, and likely so is an elephant vastly more intelligent than that of a man because elephants vastly outweighs human men.  Essentially, Mill sees this argument as tremendously absurd.  Fortunately for the future development, women are beginning to test the waters of science, art, and philosophy.  No doubt, Mill is proud of the fact that many women are getting involved in those fields. 
            Mill explains women are behind in many things because often marriage and family duties take her away from doing more and learning more; she is at the disposal of everybody.  Finally, Mill urges men to get involved in the struggle for women’s equality, to fight to improve life for women.


Chapter 4      
            “If there is anything vitally important to the happiness of human beings, it is that they should relish their habitual pursuit.”
            Mill tackles male privilege by addressing that boys are brought up to believe they are superior in every way of their female opposites.  They are born to a privileged lifestyle compared to females, a privileged lifestyle gained purely upon the sex they were born as.  Kings are drawn into this analysis.  Kings, by being born a King, think themselves superior in every way to all of his subjects, just as nobles do to theirs, and men to their wives.  Mill points out a better sense of superiority not found in birth but by hard work and personal achievement. 
            Towards the final chapter of this work, Mill, explains the benefits of equality.         

Where to read on the Internet:



Monday, January 27, 2014

Current Event: The Treatment of Women in Afghanistan


Current Event:  The Treatment of Women in Afghanistan
Explanation

Today’s current event on “Feminist Musings” is the continued deteriorating treatment of women in the nation of Afghanistan.  Today I included two articles, one from NBC, and one from Aljazeera.  Both of these sites and news articles talk about how the conditions of life for women in Afghanistan are getting worse and violence is increasing.  

As I did a little background research into the current condition I found that conditions for women have not always been as bad as the two articles explained.  I admit not knowing this because I simply just did/do not know a lot about the history of Afghanistan.  In my research I discovered that life and conditions for women were similar to many countries in the West.  They wore western style of clothing, went to school, and had good jobs like doctors and politicians.  This life style existed prior to US CIA intervention that ultimately led to Taliban rule where they rigidly enforced Islamic extremism especially upon women. 


Women, after the rise of power of the Taliban, are now forced to wear clothing head to toe, were fired from their jobs, are not allowed to get an education or hold political office, and many are raped, severely beaten, and murdered.  I decided to place this information on my Blog to illustrate that the fight for women’s rights must be a global struggle; women in Afghanistan must know that they are not alone in their struggle.  The world must show the women of Afghanistan that it collectively desires to free them from oppression.  Meaning ALL human beings are connected, we are one species not many, we must look after each other.  We all must unite to work against extreme treatment of women the world over.  The terrible treatment of women in Afghanistan must not be tolerated and MUST be stopped. 


Afghan women in the 1970s before the CIA-led intervention
Afghan women in the 1970s before the CIA-led intervention

File:Taliban beating woman in public RAWA.jpg
A member of the Taliban's religious police beating an Afghan woman in Kabul on August 26, 2001.

Articles:


KABUL – Women’s rights in Afghanistan have regressed in the past year, increasing worry about what the future holds, according to a Human Rights Watch report released Thursday.

As the country faces a large-scale troop withdrawal by the end of 2014, the organization expressed concern that, “with international interest in Afghanistan rapidly waning, opponents of women’s rights seized the opportunity to begin rolling back the progress made since the end of Taliban rule.”

The comprehensive global report outlines actions it says Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s government has taken to specifically undermine rights for women and girls.

Among those actions was a parliamentary attempt to appeal the groundbreaking law on the “Elimination of Violence Against Women,” which was passed by presidential decree in 2009.
Although the law remains valid, its enforcement is weak, the report states. A brief debate on the law “heralded, and perhaps triggered, subsequent attacks and setbacks within the government during the year,” said the Human Rights Watch report. 

Another setback was the reduction of parliamentary seats reserved for women from 25 percent to 20 percent, triggering concern that female representation may even wane further in years to come.
Also, the Ministry of Justice — with parliamentary approval — revised the criminal code, adding a provision that bans family member testimony in criminal cases. This, the report argues, “makes it extremely difficult to prosecute domestic violence and child and forced marriage.”

During 2013 there was also an uptick in violence against high-profile women in positions of authority. Targeted assassinations included the shooting of a member of parliament, Roh Gul, as she was traveling through Ghazni province with her family in August. She survived the attack but her 8-year-old daughter and driver were killed.

Meanwhile, world-renowned author Sushmita Banerjee was also found murdered in September. Her dramatic memoirs about marrying an Afghan man and escaping the Taliban were turned into a Bollywood movie, “Escape From the Taliban,” before she moved back to Afghanistan.
And the highest ranking police officer in Helmand Province, Lt. Nigar, who was known by just one name, was killed just months after her predecessor’s assassination.

Beyond attacks on women’s rights, the report outlines other general examples of “declining respect for human rights” across the country.
“Impunity for abuses was the norm for government security forces and other armed groups,” it states, which raises concerns about the “fairness of the upcoming presidential election.”



Last updated: 22 Jan 2014 11:52

Afghanistan’s human rights situation has regressed in key areas during 2013, increasing uncertainty about the country’s future, Human Rights Watch has said.
The 2014 deadline for the withdrawal of international armed forces and continued debate over the presence of US troops beyond 2014 have negatively affected the Afghan government's policies on human rights, HRW reported.

An extensive world report by HRW found that the Afghan government under President Hamid Karzai had made a series of decisions in 2013 that undermined human rights, particularly those of women and girls.
"There was continued instability and declining respect for human rights in the country over the past year. This was reflected in attacks on women’s rights," the report said.

"Impunity for abuses was the norm for government security forces and other armed groups."
Taliban fighters continued their campaign of targeted assassinations of government officials, including women, during the year and high ranking women in the security forces also became targets.
“Afghan women are all too aware that international donors are walking away from Afghanistan,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Unfortunately, those who want to curtail women’s rights realise this too.”

Political setbacks also came to the fore in 2013 as parliament reduced the number of seats set aside for women on the country's 34 provincial councils.
In addition, the Ministry of Justice added a provision to the criminal justice code banning testimony from family members, making it difficult to prosecute for domestic abuse and in cases of child marriage or other forms of forced marriage.

The report found that opponents of women’s rights took advantage of waning international interest in Afghanistan to begin rolling back the progress made since the end of Taliban rule in 2001.
It cited a May parliamentary debate on the groundbreaking Law on the Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW Law), passed by presidential decree in 2009.

The debate was halted after 15 minutes to block numerous calls for the law’s repeal, during which many people spoke out against legal protections for women and girls.
The law remains in place, but enforcement is weak.
Physical assaults
A string of physical assaults in 2013 against high-profile women, including murders, highlighted the danger to activists and women in public life.

On August 7, upper house parliamentarian Rooh Gul was shot as she travelled by road through Ghazni province. While she survived her 8-year-old daughter was killed.
Later in the year, on September 16, Lieutenant Nigara, the highest ranking female police officer in Helmand province, was shot and killed on her way to work less than three months after the July 3 assassination of her predecessor, Islam Bibi.

“The severity of Afghanistan’s human rights crisis in 2013 demands urgent action by both the government and the country’s foreign donors,” Adams said.
“The failure to make human rights a priority during the year of a presidential election, and the backlash resulting from diminished international attention and support, threaten much of the progress that has been achieved.”


Videos:

A member of the Taliban's religious police beating an Afghan woman in Kabul on August 26, 2001.




Public Exectuion of Zarmeena by Taliban



Sunday, January 26, 2014

Definition in Feminism: “Male Privilege.”


Definition in Feminism: “Male Privilege.” 

Explanation:

Often I hear individuals attempting to refute the evidence of male privilege and some argue that it is a myth.  I strongly believe more men should come out and admit and then fight to end male privilege.  As a man, for the longest time, I felt that male privilege was a myth.  But, as I did more and more research I began to be more convinced that male privilege is not a myth but an actual reality.  I was raised to think male privilege was a myth, but as I continued in my under-graduate degree to be a History Educator I found evidence after evidence in primary and secondary source historical documents that men indeed have it better in society than women.  Men continue to have a better and more privileged life than women.  Am I saying that men do not have a hard life, absolutely not, life in general is very hard.  For example, men in America have it hard in that if there is a major war they are most likely to be drafted.  Life for men is hard, if you are one to think life for men is hard like I do, then how much harder is life for women.  If both sexes have a hard life, and the male sex is more privileged purely because of biological birth, then imagine how much harder life is for women.

Then what is male privilege?  I chose the following sources to help define male privilege.  As with all of my posts on "Feminist Musings" I welcome constructive thoughts either for or against.  

Definitions:

“’Male Privilege’ is assuming one has the right to occupy any space of person by whatever means, with or without permission.  It’s a sense of entitlement that’s unique to those who have been raised male in most cultures – it’s notably absent in most girls and women.  Male privilege is not something that’s given to men in this culture; it’s something that men take.  It’s not that women don’t have the ability to have and wield this privilege; some do.  It’s that in most cases, this privilege is withheld from them culturally and emotionally.  Male privilege is woven into all levels of the culture, from unearned higher wages to more opportunities in the workplace, from higher quality, less expensive clothing to better bathroom facilities.  Male privilege extends into sexual harassment, rape, and war.  Combine male privilege with capitalism (which rewards gree and acquisition) and the mass media (which, owned by capitalists, highlights only the rewards of acquisition and makes invisible its penalties), and you have a juggernaut that needs stopping by any means.  Male privilege is not the exclusive province of men; there are some few women who have a degree of this horrifying personality trait.  Male privilege is, in a word, violence.”
Kate Bornstein, “Gender Outlaw,” 1994

“Male privilege is a sociological term that refers quite generally to any special rights or status granted to men in a society, on the basis of their sex or gender, but usually denied to women.”

“Male privilege refers to the social theory which argues that men have unearned social, economic, and political advantages or rights that are granted to them solely on the basis of their sex, and which are usually denied to women. A man's access to these benefits may also depend on other characteristics such as race, sexual orientation and social class.”

“Male Privilege: Male privilege is a set of privileges that are given to men as a class due to their institutional power in relation to women as a class. While every man experiences privilege differently due to his own individual position in the social hierarchy, every man, by virtue of being read as male in society, benefits from male privilege.  Some examples:

    •    I am far less likely to face sexual harassment at work than my female co-workers are.
    •    My elected representatives are mostly people of my own sex. The more prestigious and powerful  the elected position, the more this is true. 
    •    If I have a wife or live-in girlfriend, chances are we’ll divide up household
chores so that she does most of the labor, and in particular the most repetitive and unrewarding tasks.”

This website directs you to a checklist to describe “Male Privilege.”  This was written by Peggy McIntosh.

Friday, January 17, 2014

Fashion: "Elizabeth" by Cate Blanchett


"Elizabeth" by Cate Blanchett

Feminine fashion is my absolute favorite thing on the planet because of how gorgeous the clothing is, I decided to show everyone some of my favorite costumes on the two movies of Elizabeth played by actress Cate Blanchett in light of my Historical Moment Blog on Queen Elizabeth.  I simply showed a few that I personally pinned on my Pinterest page, there are MANY SUPER GORGEOUS gowns that Queen Elizabeth and her Ladies in Waiting wear in these two movies. Gowns are literally my very favorite thing on this planet, gowns modern or vintage, are so beautiful!!!

Queen Elizabeth

Elizabeth The Golden Age.

Elizabeth The Golden Age

Elizabeth: the Golden Age  Alexandra Byrne

ELIZABETH: THE GOLDEN AGE

Elizabeth The Golden Age

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Historical Moment: Queen Elizabeth I

Queen Elizabeth I
(1533 – 1603)

I am a day late on this I know, but I decided to dedicate this month's "Historical Moment" to the coronation of Queen Elizabeth the I that occurred on:  January 15th 1559.  I am adding her as a result of the few monarchies that were and are held by women currently and throughout history.  I also wanted to add richness to my post on Christine de Pizan's, "The Book of the City of Ladies."  Christine de Pizan would have looked upon Queen Elizabeth as a triumph for women to prove to the world that women are as able as rulers as men.  Famous political philosopher John Stuart Mill used the Queen's glorious and long reign as England's monarch as evidence that if given the chance to rule, women would show they are able to do so. Alas, women still have not been given sufficient chance to prove they are able leaders of nations. Fortunately, the few women who have ruled, like Queen Elizabeth I, have shown quite a lot of evidence that they are up to the challenge of leading their nations.  

Sadly, little faith in women and their ability to reign or lead has been gained going into the modern time.  I personally have experience men and, regrettably, even women today insisting that women are not capable of being leaders.  One woman co-worker was told me that women are too emotional to lead and will not be able to do as good a job as men.  I responded to her by saying, "It is interesting that I, a man, a member of the sex who is notorious at abusing members of your sex, has greater faith in your sex to lead."  I also reminded her that human beings male and female share a similarity in brain functions and emotional centers. Often people think anger is not an emotion, sadly, men are frequently prone to angry outbursts.  

I personally have every confidence in women to rule, reign, and lead their people.  Queen Elizabeth I's reign was a triumph in relation to evidence that women are able to lead with the best of them.  

Remembering "The Virgin Queen."

Coronation of Queen Elizabeth I!!!

Important Events, Contributions, and Accomplishments

Elizabeth was born in a time of uncertainty for English monarchs and religious turmoil and conflict in 1533. At the beginning of her life even all throughout was under constant threat from enemies within and without the Kingdom of England.  Being well educated and inheriting the intelligence and shrewdness from her parents she survived threat after threat and one challenge after another to complete a successful and long reign on England's throne.  

Background
  • The last Tudor Monarch
  • Child of King Henry VIII and Queen Anne Boleyn
  • Survived the reign of Bloody Queen Mary
  • Queen Elizabeth was well educated: Fluent in 6 languages, inherited intelligence and shrewdness from her parents, politically insightful, and a good judge in choosing capable people to help her govern.
Reign
  • One of the greatest reigns in English history
  • Secured The Church of England:  The laying down of the 39 Articles of 1563 helped prevent future religious conflicts in England this created a compromise between Catholics and Protestants.
  • She personally oversaw the appointments of 600 officials of state.
  • Her reign was an age of discovery:  Explorers:  Sirs Drake, Raleigh, and Gilbert.  
  • The East India Company was created in 1600 which introduced England to an age of prosperity and trade.
  • Artists like William Shakespeare, William Byrd, and Thomas Tallis were at their prime.  The Queen herself attended the first showing of "A Midsummer Night's Dream."
  • Her reign survived several attempts of forced removal, assassination, and foreign invasions.
  • She crushed France in their invasion attempt from Scotland.
  • She crushed the Spanish Armada of 1588
  • She put down rebellions and survived the Papal Bull of 1570
  • She survived her Scotish cousin's support of her demise in the Babington Plot of 1586.  The result of the plot was the execution of Mary Queen of Scots.      
  • She died in 1603 after 45 years of being Queen
Marriage
  • She never married
  • "The Virgin Queen." 
  • She was married to England
  • Her reign was considered a selfless reign as her interest was to her people
  • The vast majority of her people liked her
  • Her accession date was celebrated as a national holiday for 200 years
Primary Source Document:


A message to her army at Tilbury on the eve of the Spanish Armada,
1588
""My loving people, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our
safety, to take heed how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes for fear of
treachery; but, I do assure you, I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful
and loving people.
Let tyrants fear; I have always so behaved myself, that under God I have
placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of
my subjects; and, therefore, I am come amongst you as you see at this time,
not for my recreation and disport, but being resolved, in the midst and heat of
the battle, to live or die amongst you all - to lay down for my God, and for my
kingdoms, and for my people, my honour and my blood even in the dust.
I know I have the body of a weak, feeble woman; but I have the heart and
stomach of a king - and of a King of England too, and think foul scorn that
Parma or Spain, or any prince of Europe, should dare to invade the borders of
my realm; to which, rather than any dishonour should grow by me, I myself
will take up arms - I myself will be your general, judge, and rewarder of every
one of your virtues in the field.
I know already, for your forwardness, you have deserved rewards and
crowns, and, we do assure you, on the word of a prince, they shall be duly
paid you. For the meantime, my Lieutenant General Leicester shall be in my
stead, than whom never prince commanded a more noble or worthy subject;
not doubting but by your obedience to my General, by your concord in the
camp, and your valour in the field, we shall shortly have a famous victory over
these enemies of my God, of my kingdom and of my people.""

Informational Online Sites:





Books
Documentaries