Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Historical Moment: Sarah Breedlove Walker (a.k.a. Madam C.J. Walker) Self-Made Millionaire.

Historical Moment: Sarah Breedlove Walker (a.k.a. Madam C.J. Walker) Self-Made Millionaire.  


Ms. Walker driving her automobile.

Explanation

On December 23rd 1867 Sarah Breedlove Walker was born as the first free African American of her family. Her parents, Owen and Minerva were recently freed slaves that worked on a cotton plantation.  Her parents along with other slaves in the United States were freed as a result of the Emancipation Proclamation passed in 1863.

She was a native to the state of Louisiana.  At the age of 7 Ms. Walker became an orphan due to the passing of her parents.  She moved with her older sister and brother in-law to the state of Mississippi where she engaged in domestic jobs cleaning homes and washing clothes for others.  It was here that she married her first husband a Mr. Moses McWilliams.  With Mr. McWilliams she had her daughter A' Lelia.  Shortly thereafter Mr. McWilliams passed away.  

With her daughter she moved to St. Louis where she moved in with her brothers and became a washerwoman making $1.50 a day.  She also attended night school too.  It was here that she met and then married her 2nd husband Mr. Charles J. Walker.  

Hair loss for women during this era was regular, something that women suffered through as a result of poor hygiene.  They lacked the modern amenities that we enjoy today like advance indoor plumbing and basic utilities that make hair care convenient and easy to do.  As a result of many women during this time period lacking in hair care scalp disease was a regular occurrence.  

Breedlove saw scalp disease as a mountain to climb, and climb she did.  She began to experiment with all of the remedies that were available during that time period.  Her husband Mr. Walker became her advertisement agent.  She also changed her name to Madam C.J. Walker.  Using her own devised formula she traveled the country promoting her new found product.  

When her profits boomed she opened a beauty school in Pittsburgh and transferred her base of operations to Indianapolis as the Madam C.J. Walker Manufacturing Company.  

In 1913 she and Mr. Walker divorced.  Breedlove traveled the Caribbean and Latin America promoting her company and recruiting others to advance her business and product.  Her daughter, A'Lelia was put in charge of operations.  With her daughter in charge of the company, Breedlove was freed to pursue societal concerns facing her fellow African Americans.  She joined and then participated heavily in the NAACP, YMCA, NACW, and others helping to improve life for African Americans everywhere.  She contributed time and money for anti-lynching campaigns.  She helped out in many other areas as well.

At the age of 51, Ms. Breedlove died of hypertension at her estate of Irvington-on-Hudson.

Her legacy was one of hard work and drive.  Her hard work impacted both hair care and social organizations.  She earned herself the title of the first American Woman to become a "Self-Made Millionaire."  Her business that she built and her daughter managed valued over 1 million dollars at the time of her death.  She left a lasting legacy that many still look up to in the modern day.  

Happy Birthday Sarah Breedlove Walker!!!

Sources 



Sunday, December 22, 2013

Definition in Feminism: Transgender vs Transsexual.

Definition in Feminism: Transgender vs Transsexual.  


Explanation

Members of the transgender and transsexual community and their struggles in a world that discriminates against them are not widely known by the general public, because many do not let their stories be heard for fear of public ridicule.  

I recently had an unpleasant experience at work involving a co-worker that reduces women and members of the LGBTQ to titles that are not nice ones.  For example, I recently had to correct him in his thought that it is okay and acceptable to call any woman who is either having a bad day or is aggressive as a "bitch."  I hold that calling a woman a "bitch" is downright disrespectful and just as bad as using a racial slur and reveals the name caller's lack of thought and intelligence.  Do not tell me that she is being a bitch, but rather tell me intelligently and maturely how you are feeling.  Rather calling a woman a bitch, you may say, "I recently had a bad experience with a person at work.  She was being difficult and uncompromising."  After you tell me that she is being difficult and uncompromising, tell me why she was being like that.  Often I find human beings lack the ability to intelligently convey how they feel through conversation.  I occasionally have problems communicating how I feel too.  But we must continue to improve.  It is understandable that a human being has a difficult time with another human being.  But lets not reduce our intelligence as a species to name calling, but rather lets be descriptive of how we are feeling.  This idea is applied not just to men who call women bitches, but also to women who call each other bitches as well.  Women calling women bitches just make men feel justified in calling them bitches.  Collectively, let us change this.

This same co-worker came to meet another co-worker who was giving him a lift back home.  This co-worker came to say good bye to me as work was over.  As she was standing there I was still working and explained to her that I will be a little while.  She turned to our co-worker that she was giving a lift home and said, "Let's go then."  He responded, "Wait I want to see the 'transgender' get fired."  I peered over to a glass room and saw one of our co-workers who happens to be a 'transsexual' talking to her supervisor and team lead.  This particular women has been struggling with attendance issues, so as a result she had to speak to them about it in a meeting room in a private setting.  I was annoyed with this co-worker that he would be entertained by someone else's horrible day at work, that he was getting some sort of sick pleasure out of seeing a 'transgender' facing hard times at work, and finally that he used a definition that was not exactly precise to the topic.  As a result,  I assertively asked him to back off and walk away.  After he refused to I explained to him you are able to either walk away or I will ask a supervisor to help you walk away.  Fortunately he and my friend walked away, and my friend took him home.

I am bothered by these stories, because they regrettably happen with a species that is over 200,000 years old (anatomically modern humans).  That a human being would get pleasure for seeing someone different than they are have a bad day at work.  This is medieval, not enlightened.  It also bothers me that this individual did not think to educate himself on a co-worker that is different from himself.  This education may often come with a few buttons pushed on the keyboard and mouse on the internet, after a mere ten minutes of research and reading may often change someones perspective.  As a result of this experience, and many others similar to this one, I felt the need to make my first definitions' session in regards to transgender and transsexual.  

Explaining the difference between transgender and transsexual is important to feminism.  Fighting for women's equal rights helps the transgender and transsexual community because the reason for societies indifference for this group of human beings is looked down upon because many of these people are men that would much rather be women or those that embrace their femininity rather than their masculinity.  Society looks down upon men who do feminine things and want to be females because society consistently views women and femininity as inferior and for a man to cross the line from superiority to inferiority is unthinkable to them.  The transgender and transsexual community must be sick otherwise.  Reversing this for women, women in this case are too looked down upon for crossing the imagined gender barriers of today's modern world.

Definition

To help us know the difference between transgender and transsexual we will use GLAAD's website to help:

Please click GLAAD for the link's reference point.

Now I am not arguing against using the term transgender to describe a transsexual; GLAAD describes transgender as an umbrella word that often includes transsexual, but rather I am arguing that one human being should not reduce another human being to a title.  Referring someone to someone's actual name is the best thing to do.  

""TRANSGENDER-SPECIFIC TERMINOLOGY

Transgender An umbrella term (adj.) for people whose gender identity and/or gender expression differs from the sex they were assigned at birth. The term may include but is not limited to: transsexuals, cross-dressers and other gender-variant people. Transgender people may identify as female-to-male (FTM) or male-to-female (MTF). Use the descriptive term (transgender, transsexual, cross-dresser, FTM or MTF) preferred by the individual. Transgender people may or may not decide to alter their bodies hormonally and/or surgically.

Transsexual (also Transexual) An older term which originated in the medical and psychological communities. While some transsexual people still prefer to use the term to describe themselves, many transgender people prefer the term transgender to transsexual. Unlike transgender, transsexual is not an umbrella term, as many transgender people do not identify as transsexual. It is best to ask which term an indi­vidual prefers.""

Note:  Please leave your comments, I would love to read them  As always use intelligent well thought out explanations for superior topical understanding within the community at large.  


Sunday, December 1, 2013

Video: Lily Myers, "Shrinking Women."


I hope you all enjoy this as much as I did.  Please watch and enjoy.


Current Event: Project Bush

Current Event:  Project Bush

Explanation

This morning as I was catching up on the current news and events focusing on Feminist issues and concerns I ran into a news article posted on the Guardian called "Feminism is to be found in the tiniest detail" written by Minna Salami 11/30/2013.  In this article Salami considers the argument over whether or not women shaving their pubic hair is feminine or anti-feminine.  I found this article informing and thought provoking and it expanded my own understanding as to what it means to be feminine and a Feminist.  You are free to follow the embedded link hidden in the title of the article here on this Blog entry or just read the text below.  Everything in the text below is credited to the authorship of Minna Salami 11/30/2013 The Guardian.  Below the article I will interject my own thoughts and opinions that came to my mind during and after I read the article.  Overall I thought Salami did a fine job in representing the argument over women and their body hair.  

Let's hear it for an exhibition that encourages women to be proud of their pubic hair

John Ruskin, Salami, Comment
Art historian John Ruskin, who was revolted by his wife's pubic hair. Photograph: Universalimagesgroup/Getty Images
I recently attended a debate about modern feminism hosted by the editor of Elle magazine, Lorraine Candy. The topic was "Does feminism need a rebrand?" Of course, I didn't need the panel to confirm the obvious: worldwide resistance to the oppression of women is hardly something that needs to be in the business of rebranding. And brands – a cluster of images and stories that are expertly put together to create illusions that will generate money – are not in the business of resistance.
Still, the lively panel was hosted in the offices of Mother, one of the three advertising agencies that Elle had recruited for the rebranding job. Which meant I did get to see a photo exhibition by the name of Project Bush. There, in a loft in east London (of course!), I discovered a delightful room comprising two parallel wall panels. Each was tiled with collages of female pubic hair of all sorts – depilated, tattooed, au naturel, you name it. The pubic topiary was certainly diverse.
Mother says that Project Bush is "a call to action for women to stand up to the pressures of modern society and present their bushes in all their glory". The rhetoric becomes quite high flown: "Whether waxed or never tended, young, old, black, brown or white, we want to display London's lady gardens in all their variety, and demonstrate the choice that many young women – particularly – may not realise they have when it comes to waxing."
At this point, let me state my "stance" on women's pubic hair, should one need one: each pussycat to her own is my line. Sure, I am attuned to the conflicting debates on whether styling is hygienic, attractive, unfeminist, yada yada – yep, feminism now finds its battles in all parts of life. But what's more interesting is that while pubic hair is a neutral fact of adulthood for men, for women it is much more than that. Why, then, has modifying it become a thing? Why are women taking control, playing round, having fun?
It would be wrong, I think, to assume that in all the lovely variations – "Brazilian", sphinxed, heart-shaped, vajazzled or bushy and untrimmed – women's choice are simply pandering to male fetishes or indeed their fear of hair. Instead, it's a way of recouping a body part that, like so many female body parts, has a history of being subject to interpretation by everyone but women themselves.
French artist Gustave Courbet's 1866 painting, L'Origine du monde (The Origin of the World), provoked a huge scandal not only because it exposed the "cleft of Venus" but also because it portrayed a woman's vagina in its full hairy glory, rather than classically bare.
Throughout history, male-dominant attitudes in art, religion, ritual and schools have shown equal fascination and repulsion with female hair and the sexual power it implies. From artistic depictions of the virgin birth of Jesus to Rosario Dawson's bare vagina in this year's movie Trance, feminine sexuality has been mystified and vilified in equal measure.
This is not to say that there are psychological profundities lurking beneath every woman's pants; choices can also be unconscious responses to an exploitative culture or resistance to it. But one thing seems certain; whether meant or otherwise, the choices are often to do with social attitudes. And rather than shy away, critique or nag, we should take interest in what women's choices tell us about wider female sexuality.
Often, having absorbed the cultural negativity and mystery surrounding their sex, girls, upon the arrival of their first pubic hairs – a symbol of becoming a sexual adult – find it a disturbing experience. Girls are taught from a young age to feign no interest whatsoever in their intimate parts or, worse, to be ashamed of them.
Perhaps they might want to learn a bold lesson from 1940s Nigeria. A group of women led by women's rights activist Funmilayo Anikulapo-Kuti (mother of musician Fela Kuti) gathered outside the reigning ruler's house to protest against women having to pay taxes when they did not even have the right to vote. They chanted: "Alake [King], for a long time you have used your penis as a mark of authority that you are our husband. Today we shall reverse the order and use our vagina to play the role of husband." Their protests led to the king's abdication.
Talk about using your bodies with intent! I'd like to suggest that women's varied choices are not simply aesthetic reactions to sexual objectification. They are also a retort to a culture where a girl's coming of age is turned into something shameful. Regardless of the style a woman chooses, alterations for the 21st-century woman can be a way of getting rid of any embarrassment and regaining a sense of sexual energy and power. "Designing" her own look can be a way for a woman to get to know her sexual self, an expression of being an erotic being in her own right.
Consider, then, the Project Bush exhibition, an education, for men too, one that might prepare them a little more than visual education of the past. Whatever else art historian John Ruskin might have accomplished in his life, he will forever be remembered as the man who was so terrified to discover his wife's pubic hair that he was unable to consummate their marriage on their wedding night.
It's safe to assume that the classic marble statues Ruskin was familiar with did not prepare him for the glories of real life. The very diverse glories in 2013, to judge from the 93 varieties of womanhood in Project Bush.

My Thoughts
 The following are my thoughts regarding the article written by Salami.  Overall I agree with her position on women and their pubic hair.  I argue with societies erroneous outlook on gender norms concerning body hair, bottom line it is imbalanced and biased in favor of men.  In favor of men because men do not have near the societal expectations toward their body hair and shaving than do women.  I do not agree with these weighty expectations that society has placed upon women.  I do not agree because I am a man who loves to shave his legs and arm pits.  I shave these body parts for myself as do I with the hair on my head.  I do not have to shave the hair on my head but I do because it is easier to upkeep and unfortunately I inherited head hair from my father's side who all look slightly like Friar Tuck.  I shave my legs and arm pits, well, because I like shaving them.  I shave them for myself, and I shave them because I reject societal gender norms when it comes to body hair.  However, I reject the societal expectation on women to shave their pubic hair because the hypocrisy of the expectations.  Men expect women to shave the pubic hair, but men do not shave their own.  This is all of course generally speaking.
I agree with Salami when she explained that girls and women are raised to be embarrassed of their genitals, and as a result when they get their first pubs they are even more ashamed because society has ingrained in their minds that body hair on women, besides their head hair, should be something embarrassing to have.  Western society, especially in the United States, is a world obsessed on appearance.  A world where the individual is devalued because self worth is based upon how you look, or how much money you have.  Forgive me, perhaps money and looks.  I minutely forgot that America is also obsessed with their wealth too.  But I digress from the appearance factor.  
Women should never be embarrassed to be who they are.  As much as horny men may be resentful of the following statement but Porn is a contributor to this societal expectation of women because the women in Porn videos are often smoothed in their nether regions.  Other contributors are the media and Hollywood. Sandra Bullock's character in "Miss Congeniality" was a strong woman who fought to preserve the law.  Her character, Gracie Hart, was ordered to go undercover in a Miss America pageant.  The movie attempted to change Hart by saying the hard core masculine FBI Agent that she was was not acceptable and anti-feminine.  She was ordered by her superiors to undergo a makeover of epic proportions.  She was waxed, plucked, was made to put gunk on her face, she was peeled, chemicals were put in her hair, she was forced to wear heels and a tight really short revealing dress.  Bullock did an incredible job at acting the role in this movie.  The movie successfully portrayed the argument as to what real femininity is.  
"Miss Congeniality" perfectly aligns its story with the article that Salami wrote.  The question now becomes - To shave or not to shave.  Many men like John Ruskin in Salami's article make their women feel embarrassed to have body hair.  In my opinion a man expecting his woman to shave is just as negative as calling her fat or ugly.  Society puts too much emphasis on looks and devalues the person's personality and intelligence.  Salami and Mother London attempt to combat this erroneous societal expectation by supporting Project Bush.  It is utterly absurd that Ruskin would not consummate his marriage to Effie Gray because she had pubic hair around her genitals.  She was willing to consummate the marriage and Ruskin no doubt had pubic hair, the hypocrisy of it all.  As illustrated by a painting by British portrait painter in the time period Thomas Richmond, Effie Gray was incredibly beautiful.  According to Richmond's painting and opinion Gray was incredibly beautiful:
Topically specific men should not expect their female counterparts to undergo habits that they themselves are unwilling to do themselves.  To expect someone to do something that you are unwilling to do is called hypocrisy.  As a man who has himself shaved his own package to have a greater depth of experience and insight into how women feel, it was not a pleasant experience especially when my hair grew back.  It was terribly itchy.  After this experience I never shaved in that area again.  I shaved because I want to experience has much of femininity as I can to add depth to my knowledge.  One day I wore 5 inch stilettos and was on my feet for two hours straight, my feet were killing.  I did this as well to add depth, but heels and feminism is a discussion for another time. 
At the end of the day I embrace the school of John Stuart Mill, "Live and let Live."  It is not emotionally healthy for women for men to continue their barrage of hypocritical expectations.  It was not revealed in the article by Salami but Ruskin divorced Gray primarily because of his dissatisfaction with her body.  Because of this divorce he ruined her social life.  Society looked down upon her, even Queen Victoria would not see her.  It is the tragedy of women, regrettably even in modern society, that divorce often ruins their lives financially and socially.   

Note: As my first Blog post explained I invite all to comment and welcome your thoughts.  Please remain objective whether you are for or against the argument.  As in all of my posts I expect mature, objective, and constructive arguments.  Thank you.

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Literature Summary: "The Book of the City of Ladies," by Christine de Pizan


I recently read the work by Christine de Pizan called "The Book of the City of Ladies."  Christine de Pizan is one of the earliest writers in feminism.  She writes this work in response to all of the negative material written on women during her time in Europe.  The following information is an overall summary of the entire work including my own thoughts of what I read.  The information below is as a result of reading the following book ISBN:  978-0892552306.  There are page numbers and those page numbers correlate with the listed ISBN.  Enjoy my summary and the thoughts that I wrote.  Author Christine de Pizan should not be forgotten and should be praised for her hard work in a time where it was almost impossible for a woman to step out from societal gender norms.  The text below is a direct copy and paste from my notes from Word which will also include dates so as to help me keep organization.  Do not fear the size of the book, the book really did not take as long as the dates of the document may say, I put the book down and picked it back up over time.  My habits of putting it down and picking it up is in no way reflective of my attitude towards the work, but more reflective of time management and discipline.  It really is a great book to read to gain one of the earliest literature based perspectives on feminism.

File:Meister der 'Cité des Dames' 002.jpg


Christine De Pizan, “The Book of the City of Ladies.”

Lady of Reason
8/27/2013
            Today I finally got to the meat of, “The Book of the City of Ladies.”  When I say meat, I mean the primary body of the actual primary source document independent of the introduction.  De Pizan is an incredible author whose literature is undeniably some of the greatest work amount feminist literature in the world. 
            De Pizan was an Italian-French author who began writing out of interest and financial necessity.  You see her husband died prematurely and left her with 3 children:  a daughter, a son Jean, and another child who died in childhood.  Her father:  Tommaso di Benvenuto da Pizzano was appointed as court astrologer by King Charles V of France.  While living with her father in the court of the king, she became highly educated which was unusual for a female of the time. 
            As I began to study this great work on women I was most impressed when I discovered that De Pizan actually prayed to God asking him to make her a male, so that she may be of the “superior” gender.  This occurred before the three female virtues appeared to her.  This happens on page 5.  On this page her desire to be a man seems to be as strong as my desire to be a woman.  I argue with De Pizan, however, that it is woman, not man, who is superior.  Women live longer have bodies more pleasing to the eye, and their fashion is supreme.  I believe the world would have been a greater place if all of the inhabitants had the bodies of women. 
            I can’t wait until I get into this book more later on today after work.
8/28/2013
            Christine is introduced to the three Lady virtues.  They explain to her that there are protections to women in society; however, the men are forced to help women only because there are laws that exist to do so.  Though, men are filled with apathy towards those laws and protections for women are often ignored. 
            The city will be built of the strongest stone material available, it will be built high, and no one will be allowed admittance if they are not virtuous people.  The city will be built of strong stone material because it will be a symbol of feminine endurance and strength.  The City of Ladies will be able to stand the test of time.  It will be filled with courageous and famous women that will help Christine build the city and maintain it.  The city will be filled with large houses, mansions, and great inns. 
            Lady Reason will provide the building material to Christine and the other women who are within the city’s walls.  Lady Rectitude will be the woman to help build a bridge between the city and the heavens.  Rectitude will be their representative in heaven, and will occasionally come to Earth and provide help where she can. 
            Christine, along with the power and help from Lady Reason.  Reason will help Christine excavate the Earth and begin to lay the foundations of the City of Ladies.  Prior to her beginning to lay the base of the City of Ladies Christine explains to the three Lady Virtues her own physical weaknesses in terms of building a city will stone because of her female sex.  The three virtues grant her super-human strength to; along with the help of the Virtues themselves she begins laying the foundation to the City of Ladies.
            As she begins to dig the foundations, she and Lady Reason begin a conversation about the many attacks made by men on women.  Reason explains to Christine that men attack women for various reasons.  Many male authors attack women because of their own insecurity.  They feel that women may be better than them so they feel the need to put them down in order to elevate themselves.  Others attack women because they feel justified in doing so.  They feel that the immorality of women must be stopped and subdued.  Lady Reason gives philofolly, because so many men, philosophers and such, talk about the weakness and immorality of women.  Philofolly, because philosophy means the love of wisdom.  Reason argues that tearing women down is not wisdom at all, but it is folly; thus, philofolly. 
            On page 21 Christine and Reason discuss a little bit of what they were discussing in terms of philofolly by way of example.  Christine and Reason talk a little about Ovid in Roman times.  Ovid was a famous Roman author that had a terrible appetite to sleep around without showing loyalty to any woman he was with.  He only felt that women were around for his pleasure and not for anything long lasting and fulfilling.  Rome exiled him as a punishment for his promiscuity, only to recall him by friends of his in the government.  He was recalled by one condition that he essentially keep it in the pants as it were.  He was unable to do this while back in Rome, the punishment this time was castration.   After he was castrated he wrote many disparaging works about women.  This is an example of attacks on women that Lady Reason and Christine discussed between the two.  There are many more examples of this after page 21 to about page 27.
            Lady Reason and Christine analyzed together the attack made by men that women are far too emotional in particular in terms of crying.  Lady Reason makes Christine and the readers of this work that even Jesus Christ wept, in fact multiple times in the Holy Scriptures.  Reason also uses further scriptural backing to explain that women are not inferior to men considering that women were created from Adams rib, and not created below his feet.  They were meant to be equal with men and not made to serve at their feet. 
            What I also really liked about what Reason told Christine was the reason why women do not drink.  According to Lady Reason, women do not drink because men drink away the money at the bars that women could have used to drink themselves.   Women and men did not have enough money for both of the couple to drink, so often was the case that women let men use that money to drink themselves and women would go without. 
            Christine asked Lady Reason why there were no women in justice and law enforcement.  Reason explained that why women would do great things in law and learning law, they would not do so well in enforcement. (I believe Christine contradicts the mission of this work and her building the City of Ladies.  She was nervous that she would not have the strength because of her feminine sex’s weakness to lift the heavy stones and dig the foundations of the city and yet she is doing those things along the side of Reason.  Reason explains that it would not be wise in terms of time management to have three do the job of two in terms of enforcement.  I regret that Christine did not have forethought into the future she would discover that there are plenty of women today that are seeing great success in terms of enforcement, they sometimes even work alone.)
8/29/2013
            I was impressed that Christine new of the land of Meroe, south of Ethiopia.
9/03/2013
            Lady Reason continues to address the issue of women in leadership roles and helps Pizan answer the question whether or not they are able to accomplish great leadership ability as that of men. 
            She lies out before Pizan how many women were great leaders of their time and places.  The one that caught my eye and impressed me was that of Queen Blanche.  I read a little more on her in (http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/blanche-of-castile.html), and learned that after the death of her husband, King Louis VIII, she had to defend the crown of her young son against greedy and treasonous land barons.  She did this successfully.  The death of her husband occurred in 1226 CE, and her son took control in 1234 CE.    
9/21/2013 (36 – 40 Physical Strength of Women / Queen Semiramis)
            Lady Reason and Pizan discuss and compare the physical strength of men and women compared.  Are women necessarily weak and inferior to men if they lack the physical strength to match that of man’s?  Is strength necessarily defined by physical force, or can strength come from other areas?  Is strength of will and character something that can be used to define greatness as well?  Reason explains to Pizan, through using physical attractiveness with strengths in other areas, just because you may not be attractive you may have strengths in other areas.  Here Reason uses the great philosopher Socrates as her example.  Socrates was not attractive in the stereotypical sense, however, his attractiveness was in his tremendous intelligence and great power to deduct and reason.  Reason uses this example to explain though women are not as physically strong as men they have powers, abilities, and skills in other areas highly prized as well.  
            Courage, Reason says, is a great attribute as well.  There are many women with incredible courage that struggle, endure, and succeed in overcoming tremendous odds simply because they have the courage in order to do so.  She explains where there are cowardly women; there are cowardly men as well.  Using this line of reasoning, men and women are alike in this area, with some being strong and brave, and many others being weak and cowards. 
            Reason talks to Pizan about the great Queen Semiramis, wife to King Ninus (legendary founder of the city Ninevah).  She uses her as an example to provide proof of a courageous and strong woman because after Ninus passes, she becomes the leader of her people.  She is strong and bold.  She expands the area of her kingdom and transforms it into an empire, even going as far east as modern day India.  Queen Semiramis is an example of how there are many women in the present time and historically who have been strong and enduring.    
10/1/2013
            On page 51 Lady Reason praises the strength, valor, and lasting endurance of the Amazon women.  She particularly praised the name of Penthesilea.  Reason argues that she is the most courageous Amazonian Queen that had ever lived.  She praises that the Amazonians lasted as long as 800 years up to the time of Alexander the Great. 
            On page 52 to page 55 Reason tells Pizan of the great and fearless Queen Zenobia who was so fearless that she challenged the power of the great Persian leader King Sapor.  Her soldiers respected her as she would train fearlessly with them and her husband.  She would only be in her armor when addressing her soldiers.  She was also very intelligent.  Her personal tutor was the Philosopher Longinus.  Her command of her native tongue of Egyptian was great, as well as her teaching herself on how to speak Latin and Greek where she became fluent.  Her people respected her as a great leader over the kingdom.
10/2/2013
            On pages 55 – 57 Reason speaks about Queen Artemesia.  Artemesia’s husband died and left her the thrown of the entire kingdom.  As soon as she took power, immediately rose up challengers to her power and authority in the land.  Reason describes that the Queen was quite capable of dealing with the threats to her power.  She talked about the island of Rhodes and how the Queen captured the island and made it a tributary state.  One of the biggest feats to her life and accomplishments was when Sparta was troubled by King Xerxes of Persia and sent to her for help and aid.  She sent help and aid in the form of a large army with her at its head.  Reason recounts the amazing victories that the Queen had against King Xerxes. 
            On pages 58 – 59 I thought the story here was interesting.  Lilia the mother to the knight Theodoric was so ticked that he son would flee the battlefield that she went in front of them lifted the skirt of her dress and told him that if he is going to flee he might as well return to the womb in which he came.  Theodoric was so embarrassed by this act that he regrouped his army and went and fought back and conquered Odoacre. 
10/3/2013
            Page 62 I learned about the Roman woman named Cloelia who was taken hostage as an element of a peace treaty with the city of Clusium.  She and a group of other Roman women escape with her leadership and got back to Rome.  The Romans were so impressed upon her bravery that they constructed a statue and put it up in Roman itself in her honor.  This all happened over 500 years BCE. 
            After finishing the foundations for the wall of the city of ladies Reason and Pizan engage in a conversation about whether or not women are just as able as men are to learn in the sciences.  Reason assures Pizan that though men possess superior physical strength that women possess superior intellect if they apply themselves appropriately in the field.  She says that the greatest obstacle for women in this venture the fact that they restrict themselves to home making skills and attached industries.  Reason explains that if they are able to engage in other areas besides just home making that they would greatly excel in terms of intellect and skill.
10/4/2013
            What I really liked about this morning’s readings was Reason recounting the intelligent accomplishments of earlier women as opposed to the military accomplishments.  I appreciate the military accomplishments; however, I appreciate the educational accomplishments more.  Here, on pages 67 and 68 Reason speaks to Pizan about the great writer Sappho and her many accomplishments.  She is an incredible poet and her works were widely read in ancient times.  Her poetry inspired many people including the great philosopher Plato himself who was rumored to have had a copy of her poems under his pillow when he died.
10/5/2013
            On page 88 Reason talks about acquired knowledge.  One can learn many things and build great intelligence, but it’s worth nothing if the individual keeps that knowledge and intelligence to themselves.  It only becomes meaningful when acquired knowledge is shared with others.  In only spreading knowledge can ones work be learned from and retained and obtained by future generations.  Reason uses Aristotle’s work as an example of true acquired knowledge.  Aristotle is a great example because his acquired knowledge happened over two thousand years ago and we are still using his knowledge to learn and grow.  In sum, learn it, record it, and share it with others.
            On pages 70 – about around 80, Reason addresses the cultural and societal impact of many women in Mythological stories that impacted life; these peoples belief in these women affected how they worked, lived, and progressed in their respective areas of life and the world over.  The following are some of the examples that Reason addresses: (ex. Minerva (iron and steel), Ceres (the cultivation of the Earth), and Isis in Egypt (gardening and planting), Arachne (dyeing wool and making tapestries).
            She also addresses other women of great importance; women such as Pamphile who, according to Pliny the Elder, was the first to spin silk; or of Thamaris who was famous for the art of painting, and of Sempronia at the time of Caesar whose beauty, intelligence, and accomplishments made her famous. 
            I tell you these women because Pizan and Reason find it important to address the cultural impact of extraordinary women, whether of Myth or Historical, these women helped form humanity in areas where men did not.  These women and their accomplishments were so important that human beings thousands of years into the future (the 21st century) are still speaking their names and learning about their deeds and accomplishments.
            Beginning on page 91 to about page 95 Reason speaks about the first Queen and founder of the ancient city state of Carthage.  That woman and Queen is named Dido.  In sum, Dido fled the presence of her wrathful brother and took with her great treasures from the court of her brother and many followers.  Through great deception she got the treasure to the shores of Northern Africa.  When she arrived there the sellers of some land told Dido they will give her a piece of land, as much land as a piece of leather could encompass.  She took the largest piece she find and began to cut it in the thinnest strips possible.  She took those strips and encompassed a huge piece of land whereupon she began building her city, the city of Carthage.
            On page 97 Reason ceases to speak to Pizan, however, before she explained to her that she, with her help, have built the walls and foundation to the City of Ladies.

Lady of Rectitude
            From page 99 to 110 Rectitude speaks to Pizan about many women who prophesied and were proven through time that they were right in their prophesies.  One of the groups of women that Rectitude speak about were the Sibylline prophesies. 
            On page 110 Pizan asks Rectitude about the many men and some women who complain when they give birth to a girl.  Pizan has a point here in that she explains the women should be more grateful that they survived child birth and yet some complain when they give birth to girls instead of boys.  Pizan argues women who do this are simply complaining because their husbands are upset about them having girls instead of boys.  Then Pizan asks Rectitude a question whether or not girls are a greater liability to their parents than are sons. 
            From page 110 – 116 Rectitude and Pizan engage in a conversation, along with examples, about how fathers and mothers mourn when they give birth to daughters instead of sons.  Rectitude addresses that their mourning is foolishness.  Rectitude’s rationale concerning this is when sons of poor fathers wish that their fathers die so as to be free from the embarrassment of having a father who is not wealthy.  On the flip side the sons of wealthy fathers wish their fathers would die so as to be able to inherit their land and great wealth for themselves; furthermore when the sons of wealthy fathers and their fathers die, rarely treat their widowed mothers well.  Rectitude explains these sons will often take their mothers to court to obtain their riches quicker.  Sons will frequently abandon their parents and move far away from them, whereas the daughters will stay behind and take care of their parents until the day they die. 
            Rectitude proceeds to recount the many women who were fiercely loyal to their parents until their parents die.  For example: Hypsipyle defended her father, the king, even at the risk of her own life.  Her father was hated by his subjects and they tried to kill him and remove him from the throne.  She put him in a chest to hide him from the angry mob.  She went outside to calm her father’s subjects.  In the process of doing this, they threatened her with her life, and said they would kill her if she did not reveal to them the location of her father.  She refused.  With her strong loyalties and resistance to them with her bravery, they forced her to be the Queen of the land.  Albeit, Rectitude does confess that not all sons abuse their parents in such a way and that not all daughters are all as loyal, however, she argues that the scale is tipped in the favor for daughters over the sons.
            On pages 16 and 17 Rectitude and Pizan begin to people the City of Ladies as the houses, palaces, the wall, and the defensive turrets were completed.  They both set out to find the greatest of women to inhabit their fair and beautiful City of Ladies. 
            From pages 117 to 120 Rectitude and Pizan engage in another conversation about the subject of men saying that their wives are a burden to them that there is no benefit to being married insofar that a loyal and paid servant would wait on them hand and foot far more effectively leaving them away from the emotions, burdens, gossiping, and other inconvenience caused by their wives through marriage.  Rectitude mocked such a belief recounting the horrible experiences that many women have to endure.  Rectitude primarily recounts the many women who are beaten and mistreated by their husbands.  Granted this is an extreme side, in light, Rectitude explains to Pizan that there are many men who love, cherish, protect, and take care of the wives and husbands that are fiercely loyal to them and care not for the inconveniences of marriage for they love their wives.  
10/6/2013
            As concerning the subject of spousal loyalty, on page 130 I really liked the example of the wife of Socrates, Xanthippe.  I really liked this example primarily because of my deep admiration and respect for the knowledge and life insight as that of Socrates himself.  This story is sweet because Xanthippe, upon hearing news of the execution order of her husband after his trial, rushed to his side.  She initially threw the first cup of hemlock that Socrates was ordered to drink.  Albeit Socrates, touched by his wife’s compassion and love, explained to her that he must go through with the execution order by hemlock.  She stayed by his side until the end.
            On page 134 Pizan talks to Rectitude about the outrageous claim that men spread about women in that they are unable to keep confidences to themselves.  Rectitude refutes this claim by using several examples to back her up.  One example she uses was when a group of Roman men conspired to kill the Emperor Nero.  These men met in the house of a woman to plan out their conspiracy.  They met there because they had the utmost trust in this woman to keep all of their plans to herself.  One night a passerby of the house overheard their plans and in order to seek favor from the Emperor, this individual revealed this conspiracy to Nero himself.  Nero ordered soldiers to the house of this woman with orders to seize her and bring her to him for questioning.  The Emperor’s objective was to get her to divulge the names of the conspirators so he might put them to death.  As he was questioning her, she refused to divulge this great conspiracy against the Emperor along with the names of the men who were planning on killing him.  Even through torture, which the Emperor was predictable to do, she still did not divulge the names of the men behind the conspiracy of his assassination plot. 
            Beginning on page 137 Pizan complains that many men believe that is would be folly to them to follow the advice that their wives give them.  Rectitude gives to ancient examples of when two specific powerful men failed to listen to their wives advice and as a result ended up with their very lives.  The first example she gives is of course one of the most famous stories of when a husband should have listened to his wife.  This example is Julius Caesar himself.  Portia warned Caesar of the terrible omens she had witnessed that day and plead with him not to go to the senate floor that day.  He ignored her many pleadings and warnings and went to the senate floor any way.  That was the day, the Ides of March, when Julius Caesar was stabbed to death in the senate floor.  Rectitude also tells Pizan of the great general Pompey when he fled from Caesars wrath in Rome and sailed to Egypt.  The Egyptians under the Ptolemies directed Pompey in a small vessel to be protected by the Egyptians.  Pompey’s wife, Cornelia, begged him not to get into the small vessel because she had a terrible feeling of possible deception on the part of the Ptolemies.  He, much like Caesar, ignored the sound advice of his wife and entered the vessel to be carried to the land of Egypt from the sea.  Cornelia never took her eye off of him while in her Roman ship.  A little ways off she witnessed the horrible scene of the Ptolemies and Pompey’s Roman betrayers stab him to death.  Rectitude does however offer examples of when husbands listened to their wives and succeeded.  Belisarius was a great general at the court of Emperor Justinian.  A few court conspirers falsely told the Emperor that Belisarius plans on murdering him.  To protect himself, the Emperor ordered the great general to attack the Vandals.  The Emperor knew very well at the strength of the Vandal army and the weaknesses of Belisarius’s army.  Belisarius knew this information well as well.  His wife consoled him by committing to him that she will go into battle with him, she also drew out plans to conquering the Vandals.  The both of them execute the advice and military strategy of Antonia, Belisarius’ wife, and they conquered the Vandals and took the Vandal king hostage.  Justinian was so pleased by this that he ignored the false rumors of his disloyalty. 
            Pizan again complains of the terrible beliefs that men have of women.  The next thing that Pizan and Rectitude discuss is the belief that women should not be educated.  This discussion begins on page 153 and goes until page 155.  Rectitude brings in several examples were fathers have been inspired by the curiosities of their daughters in learning and growing in knowledge.  I really liked the example of Novella and her father Giovanni Andrea.  I liked this example because Andrea, a lawyer and law professor in Bologna, was so inspired by his daughters determination to become educated tutored her in all aspects of the law.  He was so effective that she, Novella, became so intelligent on matters of the law that when Andrea was too busy to teach his class he would ask her to substitute for her.  She did this with tremendous efficiency and success.  Rectitude draws upon the personal experiences of Pizan herself.  Pizan was daughter of Tommaso di Benvenuto da Pizzano, who was a counselor in the court of King Charles the V of France.  He also served as a court astrologer and physician.  Pizan, under these circumstances, was able to learn many things with her father being at court.  She was able to learn from her highly intelligent father and many other educated people in the court as well.  She became so highly educated that upon the death of her husband, Etienne du Castel, and upon her refusal to remarry again began to write in order to provide for herself and her children.  She was so successful at this that she was able to provide for her and her family became very well-known through the kingdom, and her words and knowledge are still being read and learned clear into the 21st century.  Pizan was, and still is, influential in society.  Rectitude and Pizan prove that educated women help improve life and educate society in truth and fact. 
            On page 155 Rectitude and Pizan begin to dispel the horrible myth that women are immoral and that few are chaste.  Using Biblical women and women in the Pagan stories, they both dispel this myth, and further prove that women or both chaste and virtuous.  They even tie in examples of where women refuse to sleep around even with abusive husbands and husbands that they hate.  An example of this is Mariannes, wife of Herod Antipater.  Herod was tremendously cruel including putting to death the father of his wife.  He made the command that if he dies before his wife does, because of her incredibly beauty, she should be put to death as well so to avoid letting her be with any other man but he.  Even beyond her hatred of him, she still remained chaste to him and would not be with any other man but him.  There are many other examples that go until page 160.
            From page 160 to page 164 Rectitude refutes the horrific belief by some men that women actually enjoy being raped.  She shares numerous examples of how women after being raped commit suicide because they are unable to bear the humiliation and burden of the memory of the pain and thus end their very lives.  She also discusses many women, who instead of allowing a man to rape them kill themselves before they are forced to experience this unpleasantry.  She uses the rape of Queen Orgiagon as an example of a woman, who after being raped, kills the man who violated her and presents his head to the king.  Rectitude uses these examples to dispel the horrific belief by some people that women enjoy being raped. 
            From pages 164 to 184 Rectitude recounts the argument whether or not women are fickle and inconstant.  She uses a multitude of brief and lengthy examples to prove her words that women are indeed constant and loyal in their deeds and actions.  She uses many Roman Emperors to prove the point of male inconstancy, fickleness, and cruelty as seen here with these Roman Emperors.  She recounts a few lengthy stories about women who are obedient, are not fickle, are constant, and loyal.  The example that stood out to me was a story that I read about in my British Literature class at Utah Valley University and that is the story of Griselda, the Marquis of Saluces and her husband Gualtieri and how he put her through a number of heartbreaking tests including lying to her about putting her two children to death and lying to her about a divorce and remarriage.  The essence of the story is how constant the woman is and how unwilling she was to break in the face of such tests.  It was revealed at the end of the story that she was only being tested and the Marquis awarded her for her unwavering respect for him.  They lived with each other for 20 more years after he revealed the tests in marriage. 
            The capacity to love with a deep and profound love and to be loved in returned for women and the men they chose is discussed by Rectitude and Pizan on pages 184 to 204.  The story that stood out at me the most was when Rectitude told about the deep and profound love that Ghismonda had for her man Guiscardo.  When her father the prince of Salerno found out about this love, was wrought with disappointment and anger because he felt that his daughter could have chosen someone superior to that of Guiscardo.  As a result he had him killed and his heart cut out and sent to his daughter in a golden goblet.  When she received the goblet she lamented and was deeply saddened by the loss of her lover.  As a result she took poison and poured it into the goblet with the heart and drank from it.  When her father found out about this he rushed to her side.  She uttered angry and damning words to her father.  She died and he was sick at heart for the loss of his daughter and regretted his actions.
            From 204 to 208 Rectitude addresses the concern from Pizan whether or not women dress finely in order to attract men in a coquettish manner.  Rectitude explains that although there may be women who do indeed to something like this, she does argue that there is nothing wrong with dressing in a fine fashion for one’s own satisfaction and not for others.  She further explains that there are women who dress in a fine manner because it is in their nature to adorn themselves with fine, beautiful, and pretty things.
            On page 209 Rectitude and Pizan engage in a conversation about the greed of women.  Rectitude refutes this argument with examples of generous women who care not for possessions and money. 
            On pages 212 to 215, Rectitude and Pizan wrap their conversation up by naming the many women in France at the time of Pizan that will be welcomed to live in the City of Ladies.  Pizan addresses the inhabitants of the city by stating the reason why they are all there, and it is because they are all respected, well honored, and revered.


Lady of Justice
            From pages of 217 to 257 Justice first introduces Mary Magdalene who will be the sovereign of the City of Ladies.  She talks about numerous women who were tortures, raped, and executed for their faith in Christianity.  Justice, toward the end of the book, explains to Pizan that the city is completely finished and filled with the good ladies throughout history, currently, and the ladies of the future.  My atheistic interpretation of why Justice told about these ladies was to show the pettiness, immaturity, and despicableness of the men who put these harmless women to death.

            Pizan then addresses the women encouraging them to be strong, enduring, and always disproving male falsities.  

Purpose of Blog!!!

Mission Statement of Blog

"To help spread awareness, growth, and acceptance of feminism through education."  The following is the purpose of the Blog and a table of contents of the dates and subject of the post to help everyone navigate the simplicity of the set up here.

Monthly Goals

It is my goal to provide every month at least four posts, but I will not limit myself to that number.  The four primary posts will include a Literature Summary, a Historical Moment, a Current Event, and a Definition in Feminism.

- Literature Summary:  A Literature Summary will be based from primary and secondary source documents written by feminists about a topic covering woman's issues, topics, and philosophies.  These summaries will include details concerning the primary points of the documents along with my own interjections.

- Historical Moment:  For the historical moments postings these will contain important historical events that has added to what feminism is today.

- Current Event:  Current Events will include events in the news throughout the United States and the World.  This may become the most controversial of the four primary monthly posts.

-  Definition in Feminism:  These posts will include hard to understand definitions in feminism that society does not understand.  The posts will include the definition, the meaning, and a societal example.  For example, many people in society feel that the term feminism is a word that brings up socially negative connotations instead of its real meaning - those that believe in the equality of women.

Blog Contents

2013

November 2013

Purpose of Blog

Literature Summary:  "The Book of the City of Ladies."

December 2013

Current Event:  Project Bush

Video: Lily Myers, "Shrinking Women."

Definition in Feminism: Transgender vs Transsexual.

Historical Moment:  Sarah Breedlove Walker.

2014

January 2014

Historical Moment:  Queen Elizabeth I

Fashion:  "Elizabeth" by Cate Blanchett

Definition in Feminism: "Male Privilege."

Current Event:  The Treatment of Women in Afghanistan

Literature Summary:  "The Subjection of Women."

February 2014

N/A = I apologize for the neglect.

March 2014

Historical Moment:  Bessie Smith

Definition in Feminism: "Feminist Epistemology."

Literature Summary:  "Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women, and the Rest of Us."

Current Event:  "Ms. Pac-Man."

April 2014

Historical Moment:  Kathy Kozachenko.



Note:  Please feel free to comment anytime.  Thank you for looking at my Blog, I hope you learned something about Feminism that you did not know before by viewing it.